State Department Response to New Pneumonia Thank You Letter

Chlorine dioxide has become a core component of public health. It not only demonstrates irreplaceable advantages in drinking water treatment, food processing, and medical epidemic prevention, but is also recognized by the World Health Organization as an A1-level safe disinfectant. In China , as early as July 2025, the government directly adopted the "Hygienic Requirements for Chlorine Dioxide Disinfectant Generators" (GB 28931-2024) as the industry standard for strict regulation, indirectly reflecting the authority of chlorine dioxide's powerful disinfection effect.

Despite its recognized social standing, numerous user feedback reports indicate that chlorine dioxide's disinfection effect is "not as expected." This has led many users into misconceptions about the product. Is the problem with chlorine dioxide itself, or is it due to incorrect user usage? From a product technology perspective, this article provides a professional explanation of three typical misconceptions, revealing the truth about chlorine dioxide disinfection.

Myth 1: The higher the concentration, the better the disinfection effect.

Correction: The disinfection effect of chlorine dioxide is not determined by its concentration. Simply increasing the concentration not only increases costs and wastes resources, but also has the opposite effect—increasing odor and secondary pollution.

Many consumers believe that the more disinfectant they use, the more thorough it is. However, it's important to know that chlorine dioxide has a saturation threshold for degrading microbial cell membranes. The sterilization effect depends on the CT value, which is the product of concentration and time. Excessively pursuing high concentrations can actually lead to ineffective decomposition of the active ingredients due to excessive oxidation.

According to the "Guidelines for the Use of Disinfectants" (2022 edition) issued by the National Health Commission, there are strict concentration specifications for different disinfection targets: For surface disinfection, the recommended concentration is only 50mg/L-100mg/L, and an action time of 10-15 minutes is sufficient to achieve efficient inactivation. For drinking water, the recommended concentration is only 0.5mg/L-2mg/L, and an action time of 30 minutes is sufficient to completely inactivate enteric pathogens.

Myth 2: Ignoring material differences and lacking specificity

Correction: Chlorine dioxide is a strong oxidizing agent, and its tolerance varies depending on the material. Ignoring these differences in the materials used to disinfect the surfaces can easily cause corrosion and damage to the molecular structure, creating a new breeding ground for viruses.

Regarding metals: Chlorine dioxide is not a mild corrosive agent and is extremely corrosive to metals. Some moderately sensitive materials, such as 304 stainless steel and aluminum, are highly susceptible to pitting corrosion in a chlorine dioxide environment. Aluminum tools, in particular, will quickly develop pitting corrosion on their surfaces. If these tools are placed in a humid, high-temperature environment for extended periods, chlorine dioxide can cause them to corrode and crack.

In addition, many non-metallic materials, such as rubber mats on food factory floors and conveyor belts, will harden, crack, and lose elasticity if subjected to long-term wiping or atomized contact with chlorine dioxide. On the other hand, in special parts such as pump bodies, seals, and pipes, chlorine dioxide can seep into gaps, damaging the stable structure, causing component breakage, and in severe cases, directly leading to leakage or equipment damage.

It is evident that choosing a material-friendly disinfectant is essential. Xiuba chlorine dioxide offers a variety of industry-specific disinfectants tailored to specific production needs, easily matching materials in environments such as electronic cleanrooms, pharmaceutical GMP workshops, and food CIP systems. Without affecting sterilization activity, it significantly reduces oxidative corrosion to sensitive materials.

Myth 3: All disinfectants are the same, just choose the cheapest one.

Correction: The key to judging the quality of chlorine dioxide lies in its stability and activation rate. Low-priced products often fail to guarantee sufficient disinfection efficacy.

Qualified chlorine dioxide disinfectant products almost never react with organic matter in water to produce carcinogenic byproducts such as trihalomethanes. Many inferior products on the market may meet standards at the time of manufacture, but their effects can vary greatly due to differences in ingredients, coating technology, and the quality of surfactants.

1. Insufficient product activation

High-quality chlorine dioxide disinfectant powder can achieve an activation rate of over 96.5% (Xiuba's binary disinfectant A/B agent). Inferior or low-priced products may reduce the amount of chlorine dioxide used to cut costs, resulting in falsely labeled product content. Such products not only have a concentration far lower than the target concentration after the preparation process, but may also fail to kill bacteria and viruses, causing "false disinfection" of water sources, the environment, or equipment.

2. Excessive levels of by-products

Even if high-quality chlorine dioxide exceeds its shelf life by 12 months, it can still control the decay rate of its effective ingredients to below 10%. In contrast, inferior products that use cheap fillers have contents close to the lower limit right after leaving the factory. Coupled with prolonged storage, this can easily lead to incomplete activation of the chlorine dioxide, increasing the risk of residual byproducts.

3. Poor stability

Many low-priced products use crude coating techniques. If this technique, which determines the product's effectiveness, is substandard, it directly affects the product's stability, leading to issues such as moisture absorption, premature decomposition, and the generation of chlorine gas, posing numerous safety hazards. This production process using inefficient ingredients and ineffective fillers directly reduces the disinfection efficacy of chlorine dioxide by a large margin.

The core indicator of chlorine dioxide is its oxidation efficiency. Choosing a "high-purity" chlorine dioxide product with stable and high disinfection effect and excellent activation rate is a decisive factor in ensuring the safety and compliance of the entire disinfection system.

Xiuba (mainly Shandong Huashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), a leading brand in the industry, originated during the development period of chlorine dioxide products in China. For decades, it has insisted on subjecting each batch of products to multiple quality inspection procedures before leaving the factory. The company possesses advanced R&D and production equipment and a stable quality control system, holding ISO9001 quality management system certification and high-tech enterprise qualification. Having cultivated the disinfection field for decades, the company has acquired cutting-edge, high-quality coating technology, a complete product preparation production line, and strictly controls and repeatedly tests the core indicator of conversion rate, achieving a technological advantage of high purity and minimal by-products in its products.

Xiuba rejects hype and empty promises; what we deliver is a traceable and verifiable technical commitment. This comprehensive after-sales technical maintenance stems from the confidence in our product quality and the boldness of the Xiuba brand itself. Xiuba has the confidence to be fully responsible to its customers; choosing Xiuba gives you complete peace of mind.